LEED v5
Existing Buildings
Indoor Environmental Quality
Facility Stewardship Performance

EBOM-v5 EQc4: Facility Stewardship Performance 1-3 points

LEEDuser overview

Explore this LEED credit

Post your questions on this credit in the forum, and click on the credit language tab to review to the LEED requirements.

Credit language

USGBC logo

© Copyright U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. All rights reserved.

Intent

To assess how well the building is being maintained and to gather information about paths toward increased stewardship.

Requirements

Option 1. Facility Maintenance Performance (1–2 points) 
Conduct an audit to determine the maintenance level of the facility during the 12-month reporting period. Points are awarded according to Table 1.

LEVEL 3: MANAGED MAINTENANCE
Level 3 is representative of an average building. Building equipment and components are functional but occasionally break down. Response times to service and maintenance calls are inconsistent. Equipment is upgraded on an as-needed basis. Overall the facility shows a basic level of care. At least 50% of maintenance activities are considered proactive (conducted before failure and malfunction).

LEVEL 2: COMPREHENSIVE MAINTENANCE 
Level 2 is representative of an above average building. Building equipment and components are functional and in operating condition. Response times to service and maintenance calls are consistent and timely. Equipment is upgraded regularly and meets current standards. Overall the facility shows an enhanced level of care. At least 75% of maintenance activities are considered proactive (conducted before failure and malfunction).

LEVEL 1: EXEMPLARY FACILITY
Level 1 is representative of an exemplary building. Building equipment and components are functional and in top condition. Response times to service and maintenance calls are prompt. Equipment is upgraded regularly. Overall the facility shows a high level of care. All (100%) maintenance activities are considered proactive (conducted before failure and malfunction).

Table 1. Points for Maintenance Level

Maintenance Level

Points

Maintenance level 

Audit score level is ≤ 2.5 

(between managed maintenance and comprehensive maintenance)

1

Audit score level is ≤ 1.5 

(between comprehensive maintenance and exemplary facility)

2

 

Audit methodology
The audit considers the entire facility, including building materials, lighting, equipment, maintenance, customer service, and facility upkeep and care.

Use five levels for scoring (e.g., limited management, critical response, managed maintenance, comprehensive maintenance, and exemplary facility). 

AND/OR

Option 2. Measure Cleaning Performance (1 point)
PATH 1. CLEANING APPEARANCE AUDIT
Conduct an audit in accordance with APPA Leadership in Educational Facilities Custodial Staffing Guidelines, or equivalent, to determine the appearance level of the facility during the 12-month reporting period. The facility must score 2.5 or better. 

OR

PATH 2. CLEANING SURFACE TESTING AUDIT
Conduct an audit using adenosine triphosphate (ATP) testing to assess the level of cleanliness of the facility during the 12-month reporting period. The facility must score “needs improvement” or “effective cleaning” using the International Sanitary Supply Association Clean Standard methodology110 or similar.
 

See all forum discussions about this credit »

Frequently asked questions

No results found
See all forum discussions about this credit »

What does it cost?

Cost estimates for this credit

On each BD+C v4 credit, LEEDuser offers the wisdom of a team of architects, engineers, cost estimators, and LEED experts with hundreds of LEED projects between then. They analyzed the sustainable design strategies associated with each LEED credit, but also to assign actual costs to those strategies.

Our tab contains overall cost guidance, notes on what “soft costs” to expect, and a strategy-by-strategy breakdown of what to consider and what it might cost, in percentage premiums, actual costs, or both.

This information is also available in a full PDF download in The Cost of LEED v4 report.

Learn more about The Cost of LEED v4 »

For full access, sign up now for LEEDuser Premium

Already a premium member? Log in now

Checklists

Step by step to LEED certification

LEEDuser’s checklists walk you through the key action steps you need to earn a credit, including how to avoid common pitfalls and save money.

For full access, sign up now for LEEDuser Premium

Already a premium member? Log in now

Documentation toolkit

The motherlode of cheat sheets

LEEDuser’s Documentation Toolkit is loaded with calculators to help assess credit compliance, tracking spreadsheets for materials, sample templates to help guide your narratives and LEED Online submissions, and examples of actual submissions from certified LEED projects for you to check your work against. To get your plaque, start with the right toolkit.

For full access, sign up now for LEEDuser Premium

Already a premium member? Log in now


Addenda

This credit has no LEEDuser summary

See all forum discussions about this credit »

Credit language

USGBC logo

© Copyright U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. All rights reserved.

Intent

To assess how well the building is being maintained and to gather information about paths toward increased stewardship.

Requirements

Option 1. Facility Maintenance Performance (1–2 points) 
Conduct an audit to determine the maintenance level of the facility during the 12-month reporting period. Points are awarded according to Table 1.

LEVEL 3: MANAGED MAINTENANCE
Level 3 is representative of an average building. Building equipment and components are functional but occasionally break down. Response times to service and maintenance calls are inconsistent. Equipment is upgraded on an as-needed basis. Overall the facility shows a basic level of care. At least 50% of maintenance activities are considered proactive (conducted before failure and malfunction).

LEVEL 2: COMPREHENSIVE MAINTENANCE 
Level 2 is representative of an above average building. Building equipment and components are functional and in operating condition. Response times to service and maintenance calls are consistent and timely. Equipment is upgraded regularly and meets current standards. Overall the facility shows an enhanced level of care. At least 75% of maintenance activities are considered proactive (conducted before failure and malfunction).

LEVEL 1: EXEMPLARY FACILITY
Level 1 is representative of an exemplary building. Building equipment and components are functional and in top condition. Response times to service and maintenance calls are prompt. Equipment is upgraded regularly. Overall the facility shows a high level of care. All (100%) maintenance activities are considered proactive (conducted before failure and malfunction).

Table 1. Points for Maintenance Level

Maintenance Level

Points

Maintenance level 

Audit score level is ≤ 2.5 

(between managed maintenance and comprehensive maintenance)

1

Audit score level is ≤ 1.5 

(between comprehensive maintenance and exemplary facility)

2

 

Audit methodology
The audit considers the entire facility, including building materials, lighting, equipment, maintenance, customer service, and facility upkeep and care.

Use five levels for scoring (e.g., limited management, critical response, managed maintenance, comprehensive maintenance, and exemplary facility). 

AND/OR

Option 2. Measure Cleaning Performance (1 point)
PATH 1. CLEANING APPEARANCE AUDIT
Conduct an audit in accordance with APPA Leadership in Educational Facilities Custodial Staffing Guidelines, or equivalent, to determine the appearance level of the facility during the 12-month reporting period. The facility must score 2.5 or better. 

OR

PATH 2. CLEANING SURFACE TESTING AUDIT
Conduct an audit using adenosine triphosphate (ATP) testing to assess the level of cleanliness of the facility during the 12-month reporting period. The facility must score “needs improvement” or “effective cleaning” using the International Sanitary Supply Association Clean Standard methodology110 or similar.
 

See all forum discussions about this credit »