Under Option 2, change ANSI/BIFMA e3-2010 to ANSI/BIFMA e3-2019
Under Option 3, delete the second sub-bullet under the Bio Based Materials bullet.
LEEDuser overview
Post your questions on this credit in the forum, and click on the credit language tab to review to the LEED requirements.
Credit language
© Copyright U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. All rights reserved.
To enhance the environmental and human health performance attributes associated with freestanding furniture and medical furnishings.
Use at least 30% (1 point) or 40% (2 points), by cost, of all freestanding furniture and medical furnishings (e.g., mattresses, foams, panel fabrics, cubicle curtains, window coverings, other textiles) that meet the criteria in one of the following three options.
Include built-in casework and built-in millwork in the base building calculations, even if manufactured off site. The dollar value of any individual product may be included in the total qualifying value if the product meets the criteria.
All components of a furniture or medical furnishing assembly, including textiles, finishes, and dyes, must contain less than 100 parts per million (ppm) of at least two of the five chemicals or materials listed in Option 1.
New furniture or medical furnishing assemblies must be in accordance with ANSI/BIFMA Standard Method M7.1–2011. Comply with ANSI/BIFMA e3-2019 Furniture Sustainability Standard, Sections 7.6.1 and 7.6.2, using either the concentration modeling approach or the emissions factor approach. Model the test results using the open plan, private office, or seating scenario in ANSI/BIFMA M7.1, as appropriate. USGBC-approved equivalent testing methodologies and contaminant thresholds are also acceptable. Documentation submitted for furniture must indicate the modeling scenario used to determine compliance.
Salvaged and reused furniture more than one year old at the time of use is considered compliant, provided it meets the requirements for any site-applied paints, coatings, adhesives, and sealants.
AND/ORProducts that meet the above criteria are valued according to source location (extraction, manufacture, and purchase point must be within the distances noted below):
For credit achievement calculation, products sourced (extracted, manufactured, purchased) within 100 miles (160 km) of the project site are valued at 200% of their base contributing cost.
See all forum discussions about this credit »What does it cost?
On each BD+C v4 credit, LEEDuser offers the wisdom of a team of architects, engineers, cost estimators, and LEED experts with hundreds of LEED projects between then. They analyzed the sustainable design strategies associated with each LEED credit, but also to assign actual costs to those strategies.
Our tab contains overall cost guidance, notes on what “soft costs” to expect, and a strategy-by-strategy breakdown of what to consider and what it might cost, in percentage premiums, actual costs, or both.
This information is also available in a full PDF download in The Cost of LEED v4 report.
Learn more about The Cost of LEED v4 »Already a premium member? Log in now
Checklists
LEEDuser’s checklists walk you through the key action steps you need to earn a credit, including how to avoid common pitfalls and save money.
Already a premium member? Log in now
Documentation toolkit
LEEDuser’s Documentation Toolkit is loaded with calculators to help assess credit compliance, tracking spreadsheets for materials, sample templates to help guide your narratives and LEED Online submissions, and examples of actual submissions from certified LEED projects for you to check your work against. To get your plaque, start with the right toolkit.
Already a premium member? Log in now
Addenda
Under Option 2, change ANSI/BIFMA e3-2010 to ANSI/BIFMA e3-2019
Under Option 3, delete the second sub-bullet under the Bio Based Materials bullet.
Option 3
1.Change title 'Multi-attribute Assessment of Products' to 'Building Product Disclosure and Optimization'
2. Remove the line "in which the manufacturer is explicitly recognized as the participant by the program operator" for Product specific Type III EPD
3. Remove 'USGBC approved program – Products that comply with other USGBC approved environmental product declaration frameworks.'
4. Modify bio-based materials credit requirements as: Bio-based raw products and materials other than wood must be tested using ASTM Test Method D6866 or equivalent method ISO 16620-2, or be certified to the USDA BioPreferred Voluntary Labeling Initiative that includes verification via ASTM 6866 testing. Exclude hide products, such as leather and other animal skin material.
Bio-based products that meet the criteria above: value at 50% of cost multiplied by the biobased content of the product for the purposes of credit achievement calculation.
Bio-based products that meet the Sustainable Agriculture Network’s Sustainable Agriculture Standard in addition to the testing requirements above: value at 100% of cost multiplied by the biobased content of the product for the purposes of credit achievement calculation.
In Beta Guide > Further Explanation, Replace Option 3 title as: "Option 3: Building Product Disclosure and Optimization.
In sentence under further explanation, replace "BPDO: with "MR"
Option 3
1.Change title 'Multi-attribute Assessment of Products' to 'Building Product Disclosure and Optimization'
2. Remove the line "in which the manufacturer is explicitly recognized as the participant by the program operator" for Product specific Type III EPD
3. Remove 'USGBC approved program – Products that comply with other USGBC approved environmental product declaration frameworks.'
4. Modify bio-based materials credit requirements as: Bio-based raw products and materials other than wood must be tested using ASTM Test Method D6866 or equivalent method ISO 16620-2, or be certified to the USDA BioPreferred Voluntary Labeling Initiative that includes verification via ASTM 6866 testing. Exclude hide products, such as leather and other animal skin material.
Bio-based products that meet the criteria above: value at 50% of cost multiplied by the biobased content of the product for the purposes of credit achievement calculation.
Bio-based products that meet the Sustainable Agriculture Network’s Sustainable Agriculture Standard in addition to the testing requirements above: value at 100% of cost multiplied by the biobased content of the product for the purposes of credit achievement calculation.
In Beta Guide > Further Explanation, Replace Option 3 title as: "Option 3: Building Product Disclosure and Optimization.
In sentence under further explanation, replace "BPDO: with "MR"
Furniture and Medical Furnishings calculator published
Credit language
© Copyright U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. All rights reserved.
To enhance the environmental and human health performance attributes associated with freestanding furniture and medical furnishings.
Use at least 30% (1 point) or 40% (2 points), by cost, of all freestanding furniture and medical furnishings (e.g., mattresses, foams, panel fabrics, cubicle curtains, window coverings, other textiles) that meet the criteria in one of the following three options.
Include built-in casework and built-in millwork in the base building calculations, even if manufactured off site. The dollar value of any individual product may be included in the total qualifying value if the product meets the criteria.
All components of a furniture or medical furnishing assembly, including textiles, finishes, and dyes, must contain less than 100 parts per million (ppm) of at least two of the five chemicals or materials listed in Option 1.
New furniture or medical furnishing assemblies must be in accordance with ANSI/BIFMA Standard Method M7.1–2011. Comply with ANSI/BIFMA e3-2019 Furniture Sustainability Standard, Sections 7.6.1 and 7.6.2, using either the concentration modeling approach or the emissions factor approach. Model the test results using the open plan, private office, or seating scenario in ANSI/BIFMA M7.1, as appropriate. USGBC-approved equivalent testing methodologies and contaminant thresholds are also acceptable. Documentation submitted for furniture must indicate the modeling scenario used to determine compliance.
Salvaged and reused furniture more than one year old at the time of use is considered compliant, provided it meets the requirements for any site-applied paints, coatings, adhesives, and sealants.
AND/ORProducts that meet the above criteria are valued according to source location (extraction, manufacture, and purchase point must be within the distances noted below):
For credit achievement calculation, products sourced (extracted, manufactured, purchased) within 100 miles (160 km) of the project site are valued at 200% of their base contributing cost.
See all forum discussions about this credit »Addenda
Under Option 2, change ANSI/BIFMA e3-2010 to ANSI/BIFMA e3-2019
Under Option 3, delete the second sub-bullet under the Bio Based Materials bullet.
Option 3
1.Change title 'Multi-attribute Assessment of Products' to 'Building Product Disclosure and Optimization'
2. Remove the line "in which the manufacturer is explicitly recognized as the participant by the program operator" for Product specific Type III EPD
3. Remove 'USGBC approved program – Products that comply with other USGBC approved environmental product declaration frameworks.'
4. Modify bio-based materials credit requirements as: Bio-based raw products and materials other than wood must be tested using ASTM Test Method D6866 or equivalent method ISO 16620-2, or be certified to the USDA BioPreferred Voluntary Labeling Initiative that includes verification via ASTM 6866 testing. Exclude hide products, such as leather and other animal skin material.
Bio-based products that meet the criteria above: value at 50% of cost multiplied by the biobased content of the product for the purposes of credit achievement calculation.
Bio-based products that meet the Sustainable Agriculture Network’s Sustainable Agriculture Standard in addition to the testing requirements above: value at 100% of cost multiplied by the biobased content of the product for the purposes of credit achievement calculation.
In Beta Guide > Further Explanation, Replace Option 3 title as: "Option 3: Building Product Disclosure and Optimization.
In sentence under further explanation, replace "BPDO: with "MR"
Option 3
1.Change title 'Multi-attribute Assessment of Products' to 'Building Product Disclosure and Optimization'
2. Remove the line "in which the manufacturer is explicitly recognized as the participant by the program operator" for Product specific Type III EPD
3. Remove 'USGBC approved program – Products that comply with other USGBC approved environmental product declaration frameworks.'
4. Modify bio-based materials credit requirements as: Bio-based raw products and materials other than wood must be tested using ASTM Test Method D6866 or equivalent method ISO 16620-2, or be certified to the USDA BioPreferred Voluntary Labeling Initiative that includes verification via ASTM 6866 testing. Exclude hide products, such as leather and other animal skin material.
Bio-based products that meet the criteria above: value at 50% of cost multiplied by the biobased content of the product for the purposes of credit achievement calculation.
Bio-based products that meet the Sustainable Agriculture Network’s Sustainable Agriculture Standard in addition to the testing requirements above: value at 100% of cost multiplied by the biobased content of the product for the purposes of credit achievement calculation.
In Beta Guide > Further Explanation, Replace Option 3 title as: "Option 3: Building Product Disclosure and Optimization.
In sentence under further explanation, replace "BPDO: with "MR"
Furniture and Medical Furnishings calculator published