Forum quick links
Calculating per Person
NC-v4 LTc7:Reduced parking footprintposted by Amber Duco on
We have a unique project type (zoo) and are using the "other public assembly" use where you calculate parking spaces by "0.25/person in permitted capacity where not seated". My question
Some questions about temporary parking spaces
NC-v4 LTc7:Reduced parking footprintposted by Jianzhushe Lili's on
Dear all:
Partitioning off section of offsite parking structure
NC-v4 LTc7:Reduced parking footprintposted by Chad Thurlow on
Hello
University Dorm with Designated Parking
NC-v4 LTc7:Reduced parking footprintposted by Heather Zeto on
I am working on a project located on a University Campus. The building usage/type is most closely related to a dormitory.
Kennel building type for Base Ratio Table
NC-v4 LTc7:Reduced parking footprintposted by Luís Vale on
Hi there,
Connected underground car parks
NC-v4 LTc7:Reduced parking footprintposted by Florian Schmidtchen on
Dear all. We are working on a LEED v4 NC campus project in which two (office) buildings pursuing a LEED certification.
Parking Capacity for Museum Project
NC-v4 LTc7:Reduced parking footprintposted by Elizabeth Repin on
We are working on a LEED v4 BD+C Museum project in Fort Hood, TX. The project consists of Art Gallery, Exhibition spaces, Class-rooms and Offices. There is No Local code for Parking.
Reduced Parking Footprint Calculation
NC-v4 LTc7:Reduced parking footprintposted by Sefa Sahin on
The project building is gallery, museum. Museum category is not included in the Table - Base Ratios for parking spaces, by building type. What is the best option for calculation it?
Leased off-street parking spaces
NC-v4 LTc7:Reduced parking footprintposted by Alicia Villanueva on
Hi! We are working on a project that does not provide any off-street parking on site but parking spaces for employees are leased from 3 nearby parking garages.
Disincentivizing Parking Reductions
NC-v4 LTc7:Reduced parking footprintposted by Michelle Rosenberger on
Even given the fact that LEED does not want to encourage automobile use, it seems excessively onerous to me to require a project to meet a 40% reduction if it earns even 1pt in Density or Transit.