Has anyone tried to pursue LEEDv4 LT High Priority Site as an alternative compliance path for SSc3 Brownfield Redevelopment?

If the building owner purchased the building with the remediation done as part of the purchase agreement by the prior owner can they still receive this credit?

We are involved with a project outside of the US that undertook a site assessment as part of a legal requirement to decommission a filling station previously operated on site.

Has anyone come across a building that meets the credit requirements for SSc3 but also has Lead paint, of which the owner has chosen to paint over instead of remove (which is legally ok in the stat

Our project site has two buildings that will be demolished to erect our project. Through testing that is compliant with NESHAPS standards it has been determined that both buildings have asbestos.

I've scanned the discussions on Brownfield and didn't see this addressed directly.

I have a project where some mercury contamination was found, but not enough to require remediation for the intended use as an industrial site. I assume that in order to achieve this credit some so

The definition of remediation as it relates to this credit is the process of cleaning up a contaminated site by physical, chemical, or biological means.

Would naturally occurring arsenic contamination (from trees, it appears) be eligible for the brownfield credit if documentation is provided? The soil was tested and is being remediated.

In our jurisdiction, encapsulation of contaminated soils (with a "cap" that contains and prevents leaching) is considered acceptable for remediating a site.