Greetings, We have a project, which is registered upon LEED-NC v2009, with unit type SI. The online form of EAp2 has a new form, which is directing us to upload the Minimum Energy Performance Calcu

We refer to ASHRAE 90.1 Supplementary Addendum i which discuss the LPD of tradable surface on table 9.4.5.

Thanks for the prompt and kind answer, Marcus. One more thing: Is it possible that baseline SHGC can be smaller than proposed one, even if both are below 0.25 (maximum)? Thanks

Our building energy model s.f.(table eap2-1) 74,000+/- does not match the gross building s.f. reported in 1.1A 94,000+/-. The difference is approximately 20,000 s.f.

Can you delete this comment? It was posted in the wrong forum

I am documenting an energy model for LEED 2009 EAp2/EAc1 and I would like to include a document that describes the modeling techniques used for each modeled system.

Dear All we have model the factory project with 50% A/c and 50% Ventilation and the fresh air is supplied by ERV, HRW, Treated fresh air units to A/c areas but the ERV, HRW, Treated fresh air unit

I am working on a project in the UK and the client wants to know what the alternatives are to ASHRAE 90.1 for energy modelling to demonstrate compliance with EAp2 and EAc1.

Our LEED-NC v2009 project (which has the v06 EAp2/EAc1 LEED Credit Form) is attempting to utilize the new required excel calculator and following Option 1 (http://www.usgbc.org/resources/minimum-en

Regarding what is taken as a process energy.