We have a situation where the tenant space, is within a building owned, by the owner.

for example, the project is a large building with a commercial spaces on each floor that will be sold.

CI project, 75% or more of the space is occupied by the tenant, and I have seen the 4/1/12 addenda with the replacement language for Case 2.

Is there an alternative compliance approach to this credit? My project falls under Case 1 (less than 75% of the project space), but my client owns the floors hence the lack of a lease agreement.

I am working on a project which is considering pursuing CI 2009 EAc3 Option B. I am wondering if continuous metering is required for this path or if spot metering would be acceptable.

LEED-CI 2009 EAc3 Case 1 Online form has options for sub-metering or central plant. Does the central plant mean that the tenant space is served by e.g.

Hello, we are doing a LEED CI project for a large tenant occupying multiple floors. We will pursue Case 1 (less than 75% of area) - submetering.

our Project is LEED CI v3 at credit EA c3, what is process uses ( electric) and process uses (fuel) ?????? another question , at our tenant space we have boiler fuel operated to supply under floor

This might be a redundant question; I'm sorry if it is. We fall into the Case 2 category as we're more than 75% of the building.

In Case 1 (project