Is there an alternative compliance approach to this credit? My project falls under Case 1 (less than 75% of the project space), but my client owns the floors hence the lack of a lease agreement.

I am working on a project which is considering pursuing CI 2009 EAc3 Option B. I am wondering if continuous metering is required for this path or if spot metering would be acceptable.

LEED-CI 2009 EAc3 Case 1 Online form has options for sub-metering or central plant. Does the central plant mean that the tenant space is served by e.g.

Hello, we are doing a LEED CI project for a large tenant occupying multiple floors. We will pursue Case 1 (less than 75% of area) - submetering.

our Project is LEED CI v3 at credit EA c3, what is process uses ( electric) and process uses (fuel) ?????? another question , at our tenant space we have boiler fuel operated to supply under floor

If a client owns all of the interior space, then I assume that they would obtain this credit, since they pay all of their energy and water bills. Would I be correct?

Does the cold water feed to tenant spaces need to be metered for this credit. Cold water consumption does not feature in the energy model.

I'm working on a LEED-CI project occupying 100% of the tenant space.

Does anyone know if the Exemplary Performance option for BD+C given for sharing energy data via a Third-party template is available for ID+C? I haven't seen anything about it either way.

I am trying to think through an alternative compliance. Please humor me. So I am working on a building where the tenant owns and occupies the entire building.