Forum quick links
Understanding the definition of existing land
NC-v4.1 MPR1:Must be in a permanent location on existing landposted by Nina Swanson on
Hello! I am working on a green building certification strategy for a client and I am building out a few slides on MPRs.
Additions
NC-v4 MRc1:Building life-cycle impact reductionposted by Lorax Partnerships on
Our project is an addition built into the crotch of an L-shaped building.
BASELINE ROTATION NOT REFLECTING ON HTML
EBOM-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performanceposted by Jas Cap on
I have a problem in simulating the Baseline Building.
Project in a resort attached to casino that allows smoking
NC-v4 EQp2:Environmental tobacco smoke controlposted by Anna Kaelin on
I have a client planning a complete fit-out of one of their retail spaces. The project is located in a resort in Las Vegas, which is attached to a Casino that allows smoking.
Using carbon credits for scope 2
Retail-CI-v4 EAc6:Green power and carbon offsetsposted by Raissa Petri on
Hello,
feasibility for USACE projects
Pilot-Credits IPpc98:Assessment and Planning for Resilienceposted by Alison Kerr on
The credit can be documented and achieved for USACE projects, and it is in line with Army customer increased attention to resilience.
easily feasible for DoD projects
Pilot-Credits WEpc153:Water Leak Detection and Monitoringposted by Alison Kerr on
Since building monitoring systems are already requied this is a low-cost Pilot credit that ties easily into most deisgns.
Name incorrect, and usefulness for USACE in-house design
Pilot-Credits IPpc90:Social equity within the operations and maintenance staffposted by Alison Kerr on
IPpc90 in LEED Online, v4, BD+C is "Social equity within the project team." Not "...the operations and maintenance staff." My comment is regarding the Project Team Pilot credit.
"with errata but without addenda"
NC-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performanceposted by Alfonzo Collins on
The LEED v3 reference book already refers to ASHRAE 90.1 "with errata but without addenda." The v4 book only says "with errata." Does that imply that all addenda to ASHRAE 90.1 must be