Post a question or comment
Filter by location
Forum
Topic
Replies
Recent

Operational Planning and Response for Resilience

LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Comments
posted by  Birgitte Messerschmidt  on 

Missing that the emergency response plan should be communicated to the local fire department. 

0

Need More attention to Cleaning

LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Comments
posted by  Brian Rauch  on 

The draft version of LEED v5 for existing buildings (1)undervalues cleaning in the weighting process, (2)eliminates the prerequisite for systems and worker training, and (3) does not provide a soci

0

Project Priorities & Innovation (IN) – Public Comment Draft, Page 59

LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Comments
posted by  Dean Stanberry  on 

The term “Project Priorities” implies transactional activities. There is no recognition of operational activities.

0

Location and Transportation (LT) – Public Comment Draft, Page 10

LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Comments
posted by  Dean Stanberry  on 

Granted a maximum of 10 points, this credit category is overweight, given that an existing building has no control over its location and minimal control over transportation alternatives.

0

Indoor Environmental Quality (EQ) – Public Comment Draft, Page 45

LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Comments
posted by  Dean Stanberry  on 

While the total of 20 points for this category is adequate, it is overweighted toward the Indoor Air Quality Performance and Occupant Satisfaction Survey.

0

Sustainable Sites (SS) – Public Comment Draft, Pages 14 & 8

LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Comments
posted by  Dean Stanberry  on 

There are no basic concerns with the Sustainable Sites credit category, as the credit/points are all within the building sphere of control. The credit category may be underweighted at 2 points.

0

Materials and Resources (MR) – Public Comment Draft, Page 42

LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Comments
posted by  Dean Stanberry  on 

This credit category is underweighted from an operations perspective. More attention should be focused on adopting circular economy principles over simple waste disposal strategies.

0

Materials and Resources (MR) – Public Comment Draft, Page 42

LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Comments
posted by  Dean Stanberry  on 

This credit category is underweighted from an operations perspective. More attention should be focused on adopting circular economy principles over simple waste disposal strategies.

0

Water Efficiency (WE) – Public Comment Draft, Page 17

LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Comments
posted by  Dean Stanberry  on 

From an operations perspective, we believe the Water, Energy, Waste, and IEQ credit categories should have a more balanced point allocation.

0

EA Credit: GHG Emissions Reduction

LEED v5 O&M Existing Buildings Public Comments
posted by  James Lee  on 

This credit provides 3 options to achieve a total of 12 points for GHG emissions reduction:

1. Option 1 (reduction of Scope 1 emissions): 1-6 points.

0