As most products selected for our project have EPDs, HPDs, and SDSs, it is easy to find the locations of the information for this Pilot Credit. It would be great if these manufacturers could also analyze the information and put it in the format of the worksheet, as Sherwin Williams has done. This is a good stepping stone credit for the information necessary for the LEED v5 requirements that will soon be required.
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Hello Oluwasina,This is the first time I documented this credit but the manufacturers that had all accessible information are: ASSA ABLOY and ALLEGION. Even though the worksheet was not provided like Sherwin Williams, disclosed EPDs contain most necessary information, and given that the products were of minimal impact such as door exits or emergency exit devices, most section could be filled out as negligible or with minimal ipacts towards health, environment.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
Thank you for sharing your feedback!
This pilot credit is a strong bridge between disclosure and actual analysis, and a useful stepping stone toward the more rigorous material evaluation expected in LEED v5. I was especially glad to read your point about manufacturers preparing data in the worksheet format, because that is a real example of market transformation. Kudos to Sherwin-Williams for taking that extra step. It makes the credit much more practical for project teams, encourages more informed and healthier material selection, and helps move the industry in the right direction.
Do you know of other manufacturers with documentation that presents their product impact analysis in a format similar to the worksheet?