FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Distric Energy System

Dear all, Currently we are working on an industrial facility pursuing LEED 2009 NC – Major Renovation certification. The building consists of 3 levels. The top 2 will be completely refitted (envelope and systems), whereas the ground level with not be altered. The project building is supplied by a Central Plant, which also supplies a second building. As the plant is not located in the project building, it needs to be considered as a DES plant. The team decided to use the performance path (energy modeling) and DES Option 1 (stand-alone scenario) to achieve compliance under EAp2 and EAc1. A Waste Heat Recovery System will be part of the project building’s thermal conditioning strategy. This system recovers heat from the industrial process machines (located in 2nd and 3th level of the project building) and brings it back to the Central Plant, where is used to cover the building´s heating demand. The recovered heat has been taken into account for the dimensioning of heating and cooling ventilation rates and power requirements in the project building. 1. Should the Waste Heat Recovery System be considered as Downstream or Upstream? If this is considered as Upstream, how should the Removed Heat be taken into account? Could the equipment loads, which are removed by the Waste Heat Recovery System, simply be deducted from the total equipment loads when inputting internal gains? 2. In the project building, a new AHU supplies the 2nd and 3th levels, but the 1st level is supplied by an existing AHU which also partly supplies the second building. How should the already existing AHU be taken into account? Should only the relevant partial capacity be considered? Thanks

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 04/21/2017 - 14:20

1. It is upstream since the waste heat is recovered at the plant. If using option 1 you can't claim any credit for the effect on the plant of the waste heat recovery. That would require the use of option 2. And no you cannot deduct the equipment loads. 2. The existing system is modeled identically in the baseline and proposed. Yes, only the relevant partial capacity should be modeled.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.