Latest review comments based on LEEDUser policy template

I just received these review comments for this credit (we used the LEEDUser suggested policy template): The IPM plan includes pyrethrum as a suggested treatment for flies on page seven, but pyrethrins are considered a Tier I (high hazard) pesticide per the SF Pesticide Hazard Screening List. Further, the plan includes diatomaceous earth (DE) as a suggested treatment for ants on page six, but it is unclear if DE is considered a least toxic pesticide. Based on internet research, the chemical name of DE is Silica and Silica gel is listed as a Tier II (high hazard) pesticide per the SF Pesticide Hazard Screening List. Additionally, note that on page five of the plan in the chemical controls section, the SF Reduced-Risk Pesticide List is referenced rather than SF Pesticide Hazard Screening List. The SF Pesticide Hazard Screening List contains the official list of products and chemicals that meet the Tier III Hazard Criteria and can be located at http://www.sfenvironment.org/article/pest-management/least-toxic-pesticidesfor-green-buildings. As the SF Pesticide Hazard Screening List is referenced on page two of the plan under the least-toxic pesticide section, credit compliance is not affected. For future submittals, please ensure that the plan only evaluates least toxic and non-least toxic pesticides according to the San Francisco Tier III hazard criteria and the list contained in the SF Pesticide Hazard Screening List.