See all forum discussions about NC-2009 EAp2

Subscribe to new posts about NC-2009 EAp2 Post a new question aboutNC-2009 EAp2

See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-2009 EAp2»

FAQs about EAp2 :

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

"Other" in Target Finder

Maura Adams

Environmental Stewardship Manager

LEEDuser Basic Member

114 thumbs up

August 13, 2012

I'm working on a science building on a prep school campus with a lot of lab space. It was entered as a school into Target Finder, but obviously compares poorly to regular school buildings. The initial review notes that our Target Finder result (10) "indicates higher than average consumption for a newly constructed building reported to have a performance improvement of 26.62% using the ASHRAE 90.1..." etc. Right! But that's because it's being compared to dissimilar buildings. Should we enter it as "Other" instead? Does LEED accept that? Or should we just explain the apples-to-oranges problem?

Post a reply

Marcus Sheffer

LEED Fellow

7group / Energy Opportunities

LEEDuser Expert

4454 thumbs up

Mon, 08/13/2012 - 17:45

Just explain that the project has a significant lab component. I would check off on the form that Target Finder does not cover this project type.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.