See all forum discussions about CS-2009 EAc5.1
 Subscribe to new posts about CS-2009 EAc5.1 Post a new question aboutCS-2009 EAc5.1
See LEEDuser’s guidance on CS-2009 EAc5.1»
FAQs about EAc5.1 :

How can I choose between Option 1 (Calibrated Simulation) and Option 2 (Energy Conservation Measure Isolation)?

What am I required to submeter for this credit?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CS-2009 EAc5.1:Measurement and Verification—Base Building

Quality Assurance

Profile picture for user cmccabe_1
Ciaran McCabe
Director
Passive Dynamics Sustainability Consultants
LEEDuser Basic Member
12 thumbs up

Can anyone help with the following LEED reviewer comment that we received. "Provide a description of Quality Assurance procedures, focusing on what will occur if model calibration is not initially achieved"

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user sheffer
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow
7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
4454 thumbs up

Thu, 04/27/2017 - 13:08

That sounds to me like the reviewer is combining two difference aspects of what should be in the M&V Plan. The first are the quality assurance procedures. This should be related to all aspects of data gathering and the calibration procedures. The second are usually referred to as corrective action. Basically what will you do if the predicted savings are not realized in the calibration. These would typically involve evaluating the building systems to find ways to further reduce the energy use.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.