See all forum discussions about NC-2009 SSc4.4
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-2009 SSc4.4 Post a new question aboutNC-2009 SSc4.4
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-2009 SSc4.4»
FAQs about SSc4.4 :

If a non-residential project wants to use Option 4, which references the  ITE Parking Generation Study, where does one upload and submit required documentation? There is no Option 4 choice in the credit form.

How do you designate preferred parking if the parking facility is not under the owner's control?

How does one apply minimum zoning requirements to a project when it is part of a larger complex or campus?

Are there standards regarding how to document the spaces that will be dedicated as reserved?

How does a carpool/vanpool relate to a shared car service/company when it comes to the preferred parking requirements of this credit?

Should I consider motorbikes and parking spaces for them under this credit? What about fleet vehicles?

How does one account for off-site parking. Should the LEED boundary encompass this parking? Or alternatively may the project pursue the "no new parking" option?

If a project does not provide parking onsite but provides a shuttle service to new parking offsite, is that considered “no new parking” since the new parking is not onsite?

Does rebuilding an existing parking area with fewer spaces mean “no new parking”?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 SSc4.4:Alternative Transportation—Parking Capacity

signage verbage...

I see the example in this website states "reserved carpool and vanpool parking only" The project I am working on has approved submittal/shop drawing in which it states "high occupancy vehicle parking only" is this going to be a problem?

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user amber_2
Lauren Wallace
LEED Project Reviewer, LEED AP BD+C, Senior LEED Specialist
Certifications Department Manager, Epsten Group, Inc.
LEEDuser Basic Member
26 thumbs up

Wed, 11/20/2013 - 20:49

Michael, I don't see where that should be an issue. There is more issue in the way in which you label LE/FE parking spaces, though most often the signage verbiage is just noted as an educational note when GBCI feels that there is some concern with the language.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.