Forum quick links
LEED NC 2009 EAc5 Measurement and Verification
NC-2009 EAc5:Measurement and Verificationposted by Jim Gardler on
We have developed a M&V plan for a mixed use Multi tenant high rise with commercial space in the building with the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) as the
EAc5 v2009 putting together M&V at the end of the project
NC-2009 EAc5:Measurement and Verificationposted by Lou Niles II on
We are extremely late in a project and the team believes we intended to attempt EAc5 all along. When is it too late to achieve / document for EAc5 M&V for NC v2009?
EnergyStar Reporting
NC-2009 EAc5:Measurement and Verificationposted by Karl Heitman on
Our project is registered under LEED 2009, and my Reference Guide doesn't show Option 3. Is the Option 3 new? Is it for exemplary credit only?
End Uses
NC-2009 EAc5:Measurement and Verificationposted by Matthew VanSweden on
I realize that EAc Advanced Energy Metering is not listed in the v4 credits that you are allowed to use on v2009 projects but has anyone had any success utilizing the v4 metering language of "insta
AHU LEED Certificate
NC-2009 EAc5:Measurement and Verificationposted by Tota Yun on
We got this quote from manufacturer regarding AHU compliance ((While some sections of this standard do not apply to our product, we do comply with the sections that apply. According to the standa
EAc5 Option 3
NC-2009 EAc5:Measurement and Verificationposted by Jeff Wiedmeyer on
I have a client who has chosen to meet MPR#6 by selecting Option 2: USGBC Approved Data Template.
Is water submetering required for LEED v3 2009?
NC-2009 EAc5:Measurement and Verificationposted by May Le on
Hello, I can't seem to locate where LEED specifies what energy sources need to be su bmetered. I know that electricity end uses need to be sub metered for LEED v3 but does water?
ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager
NC-2009 EAc5:Measurement and Verificationposted by Lou Niles II on
When does the project have to register for the Energy Star Portfolio Manager? it is not clear if a registration number needs to be shown to comply for the Credit.
overall accuracy, anticipated areas of error susceptibility
NC-2009 EAc5:Measurement and Verificationposted by Leanne Niu on
There is a review comment in my project as follows: It appears that the M&V plan provided does not specify the expected overall accuracy, anticipated areas of error susceptibility, and magnitud
GC Responsible for Implementing Option B?
NC-2009 EAc5:Measurement and Verificationposted by Marcia Weekes on
Does anyone have any experience with projects where a GC has been given the responsibility for implementing the M&V credit using Option B?